AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

The Queen's Passing and What She was to Great Britain and the World

(@isabelle)
Noble Member
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 196
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

That being said, I wonder if Scotland will now demand its independence? 

 

Also, article in today's NY Times:  As most British have had to deal with economic austerity, King Charles has spent the past 50 years turning his estate into a billion-dollar portfolio.  Something very wrong in this concept, I admit.  

How King Charles Turned His Royal Estate Into a Lucrative Portfolio - The New York Times (nytimes.com)



   
Lauren, LalaBella and Vesta reacted
ReplyQuote
(@jeanne-mayell)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 10 years ago
Posts: 7286
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

@Isabelle Thank you for posting about Charle's holdings. Adds a pretty grotesque picture to the British monarchy.  I'd like to see Scotland ask for independence.



   
Lauren, Isabelle, LalaBella and 1 people reacted
ReplyQuote
(@isabelle)
Noble Member
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 196
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

@jeanne-mayell

 

Yes, I'm shocked that, at minimum, Charles is not required to pay inheritance taxes as every other Brit is required to do.  The dollar amount from this alone to the British government would be enormous.  Huge inequity here.  



   
ReplyQuote
(@ana)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 1036
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

It would go a good way towards mitigating the elitist image if Charles would donate a few of his holdings to the state to use as a national park, or other facility that everyone could use and enjoy. 

Also he could promote goodwill amongst the former colonies by returning some artifacts and other treasures to their countries of origin.  For example, I read that the Indian Koh-i-noor diamond is part of the Crown jewels.  That would be an easy thing to return, I would think. It's not like it's worth keeping for scholarly pursuits or for its monetary value (because I doubt the Crown would sell it).  There must be more "low hanging fruit" like this that he could start with.  

That said, I do think the monarchy has great value as a national focal point and spiritual/moral anchor for the British people.   I mean, I'm American, yet the death of the Queen leaves a small part of me feeling unmoored.  Strange but true.  But they do have room to scale back, and they really should in this era.  



   
Pegesus, Jeanne Mayell, Lauren and 2 people reacted
ReplyQuote
(@dolphinspirit)
Honorable Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 90
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

@jeanne-mayell 

I also have a different thought of the House of Windsor. I love the history of course but I now see the value in a continuity that stabilizes. I read a few years ago that the monarchy brings in more tourist dollars than it costs. Well assuming that is still the case, I feel more accepting of what it means to some. Of course those wanting to bring it down also hold a balance for whatever happens next. I recently watched Netflix - House of Windsor, I recommend it, especially for the early history. I too never saw Charles being king for long. 

 

 



   
ReplyQuote
(@tgraf66)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 819
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

@dolphinspirit There is a glitch on the site such that the page doesn't automatically refresh after you make a post.  For the time being, when you make a new post or reply to a post, click "add reply", wait a few seconds, and then manually refresh the page.  Your post should appear without duplication.



   
ReplyQuote
(@elaineg)
Noble Member
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 404
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

@jeanne-mayell How is this different from paying property tax? It can get pretty high.



   
ReplyQuote
Page 3 / 3