Please look at this pic in the article about T. He looks high..geez
https://nypost.com/2020/02/29/trump-crouches-behind-cpac-podium-to-mock-bloombergs-height/
ok i looked. Wish i wouldn't have. And yes, he looks H.A.F. Some folks are actually more fun to be around, when they are high. He isn't.
When your Orange nightmare supporting friends tell you how great T is with the stock market /economy, tell them he owns 8 of the worst dips in the market in history:
Perhaps the Ides of March are starting to blow : https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/mar/05/mueller-report-justice-department-unredacted
I'm sure everyone has seen at least the clip of last nights "town Hall on Fox". I found it interesting that after three and a half years of declaring loudly "I will not cut you Social Security or Medicare" now he is cutting "entitlements". I hope to you know where that some of his followers who maybe still have half a brain left realize what this means. I also hope the Dems jump on it with both feet! I seriously doubt that Turd will be abe to debate either of the Dems running. If he tries to go after Bidens son all Joe has to do is bring up the Charity his kids started and stole from. As for Bernie, Turd doesn't have the brains to understand what Bernie is talking about. Everytime I see Turd he looks worse tha the last. He is blowing the health crisis and going to play golf this weekend, needs the aderation of his paying club memebers and possibly a few of the pro golfers like Tiger and Jack who blow smoke up his butt so he will fund their projects.
Hmmmmmmmmmmm.
Judge Reggie Walton will decide whether the redacted portions of the Mueller report can remain in place.
March, 2020
"Indictments of Trump family members become public." Baba
"Indictments of bad actors in the Trump administration are handed down."
Predicted 10/9/19
Judge Reggie Walton asked if Barr's actions were a "calculated attempt" to help President Donald Trump and opined the attorney general had a "lack of candor" with the public and Congress.
Yes!!! That was the point
The Court cannot reconcile certain public representations made by Attorney General Barr with the findings in the Mueller Report," Walton wrote on Thursday. Barr's initial publicly announced interpretation of the findings from former special counsel Robert Mueller "cause the Court to seriously question whether Attorney General Barr made a calculated attempt to influence public discourse about the Mueller Report in favor of President Trump despite certain findings in the redacted version of the Mueller Report to the contrary."
Walton said he will review the full Mueller report himself to make sure the Justice Department didn't over-redact it for public release.
Walton said he was "troubled" by Barr's initial, quickly released letter clearing the President of wrongdoing and distancing his campaign from Russian interference in American politics. Walton also took issue with Barr's press conference about Mueller's findings and other public statements before the report was made public.
"The speed by which Attorney General Barr released to the public the summary of Special Counsel Mueller's principal conclusions, coupled with the fact that Attorney General Barr failed to provide a thorough representation of the findings set forth in the Mueller Report, causes the Court to question whether Attorney General Barr's intent was to create a one-sided narrative about the Mueller Report -- a narrative that is clearly in some respects substantively at odds with the redacted version of the Mueller Report," Walton wrote.
https://apple.news/AhHxRhf00Q4CtcTym3TDXcQ