Notifications
Clear all
Translate
▼
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
I wanted to add to my reply above that even if such a law could not be used against those already confirmed, it's still a good idea to have one for the future - though it boggles my mind that such a law should even be necessary, as its intent and effects ought to be intuitive in the selection and confirmation process. In any case, my concern with such a law would be, who sets the qualifications, and who gets to determine if those qualifications have been met?
In addition, not being able to have a retroactive law would not and does not prohibit investigations and impeachment/removals of unqualified judges, including those who were appointed to SCOTUS.
Page 8 / 8
Prev