Notifications
Clear all

Earth Science Information and Technology

(@jeanne-mayell)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 9 years ago
Posts: 7252
 

@lovendures. these efforts give hope. They claimed that they saved a grocery chain $3000 in refrigerator bills during one summer where they normally spend $100,000.  Hard to follow it, but are they saying they could built the technology so large that they'd cool the air outside, not just refrigerator cases?



   
Vesta, Share, Anonymous and 1 people reacted
ReplyQuote
(@lovendures)
Illustrious Member
Joined: 8 years ago
Posts: 4117
 

 I really have an inssue with chemical companies.  Here is the latest example of why!  You really need to take stock and rethink carry-out boxes and food packaging.  Damn!

 

Chemical giants DuPont and Daikin knew the dangers of a PFAS compound widely used in food packaging since 2010, but hid them from the public and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), company studies obtained by the Guardian reveal.

The chemicals, called 6:2 FTOH, are now linked to a range of serious health issues, and Americans are still being exposed to them in greaseproof pizza boxes, carryout containers, fast-food wrappers, and paperboard packaging.

The companies initially told the FDA that the compounds were safer and less likely to accumulate in humans than older types of PFAS, also known as “forever chemicals” and submitted internal studies to support that claim.

But Daikin withheld a 2009 study that indicated toxicity to lab rats’ livers and kidneys, while DuPont in 2012 did not alert the FDA or public to new internal data that indicated that the chemical stays in animals’ bodies for much longer than initially thought.

Science from industry, the FDA and independent researchers now links 6:2 FTOH to kidney disease, liver damage, cancer, neurological damage, developmental problems and autoimmune disorders, while researchers also found higher mortality rates among young animals and mothers exposed to the chemicals.

Had the FDA seen the data, it is unlikely that it would have approved 6:2 FTOH, said Maricel Maffini, an independent researcher who studies PFAS in food packaging. And though Daikin may have broken the law, it and DuPont, which has previously been caught hiding studies that suggest toxicity in PFAS, are not facing any repercussions.

 

More can be found at the link below:

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/may/12/chemical-giants-hid-dangers-pfas-forever-chemicals-food-packaging-dupont?fbclid=IwAR3K6VzizsG_HHTXw6cA63Vn5v5P7R9Hr3HsxmpssG6B3pe3W6xuELeiDc8



   
ReplyQuote
Page 2 / 2